moon_custafer: neon cat mask (Default)
Don’t know why, but it’s occurred to me just now that there is an opposite trope to the sexy fadeout, which is the eye-contact-that-leads-directly-to-sex – two characters catch each other’s eye in a public place, or have a short conversation on some mundane topic – then in the next shot they’re in bed together, with no intervening steps shown. Kind of frustrating to those audience members (i.e. me) who’d like to know just *what* was said to get things moving so fast…

Date: 2011-03-02 04:22 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] crankydon.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
I know. I, for example, was cruelly disappointed to discover that the whole process in real life seems to take much longer than it does for a bit of eye-contact and to say something like "Bond; James Bond."

Date: 2011-03-02 06:10 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] moon-custafer.livejournal.com
It's possible the screenwriters don't know either, so they're just skimming ahead.

Date: 2011-03-03 06:26 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] leahbobet.livejournal.com
Step #2: ...
Step #3: Profit!

Date: 2011-03-04 03:02 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] crankydon.blogspot.com (from livejournal.com)
Quite possibly true. I remember hearing how the author of the "Lensman" series freely admitted that he knew nothing of romance and would call his wife in for a bit of ghost writing when it came to the female side of any romantic scene.

Date: 2011-03-04 04:38 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] moon-custafer.livejournal.com
Well he must’ve known something, or he wouldn’t have had a wife to help write the romance scenes .. : )

Wasn’t the female lead in the Lensman supposed to look suspiciously like Smith’s wife anyway?

Profile

moon_custafer: neon cat mask (Default)
moon_custafer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234 56 7
891011 121314
151617 18192021
2223 242526 2728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 09:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios